Thursday, June 7, 2012

Kings hit the road again in search of 1st Cup win

Los Angeles Kings Dwight King, left, and teammates Dustin Brown, rear, and Trevor Lewis watch the closing seconds of play against the New Jersey Devils in the third period during Game 4 of the NHL hockey Stanley Cup finals, Wednesday, June 6, 2012, in Los Angeles. The Devils won the game 3-1. (AP Photo/Jae C. Hong)

Los Angeles Kings Dwight King, left, and teammates Dustin Brown, rear, and Trevor Lewis watch the closing seconds of play against the New Jersey Devils in the third period during Game 4 of the NHL hockey Stanley Cup finals, Wednesday, June 6, 2012, in Los Angeles. The Devils won the game 3-1. (AP Photo/Jae C. Hong)

Los Angeles Kings' goalie Jonathan Quick catches a shot on goal in the first period during Game 4 of the NHL hockey Stanley Cup finals against the New Jersey Devils, Wednesday, June 6, 2012, in Los Angeles. (AP Photo/Jae C. Hong)

Los Angeles Kings' Willie Mitchell, left, and New Jersey Devils' Zach Parise struggle to control the puck in the first period during Game 4 of the NHL hockey Stanley Cup finals, Wednesday, June 6, 2012, in Los Angeles. (AP Photo/Mark J. Terrill)

New Jersey Devils goalie Martin Brodeur (30), Bryce Salvador (24) and Los Angeles Kings center Trevor Lewis (22) fight for control of the puck in the third period during Game 4 of the NHL hockey Stanley Cup finals, Wednesday, June 6, 2012, in Los Angeles. (AP Photo/Jae C. Hong)

(AP) ? After 45 years of waiting, the Los Angeles Kings' quest for their first Stanley Cup title will last at least a few more days.

The Kings had a chance to sweep New Jersey out of the Stanley Cup finals on Wednesday night, but they were done in by three third-period goals in a 3-1 loss to the Devils in Game 4.

While the Kings are an amazing 15-3 in this remarkable postseason run, they have lost three Game 4s with a chance for a sweep. No worries, though, as Los Angeles bounced back in Game 5 to knock out Vancouver and Phoenix on the road. The Kings managed to sweep St. Louis in the second round.

The Devils claimed their first lead of the series in the third period before Kings defenseman Drew Doughty tied it. Adam Henrique put New Jersey ahead to stay with 4:29 left, and Ilya Kovalchuk secured the Eastern Conference champions' first win of the series with an empty-net goal.

Now it's back to New Jersey for Game 5 on Saturday night.

"It was pretty even all the way, but they found a way to get a late goal," Kings captain Dustin Brown said. "We had some chances early in the third, but we didn't bury it, and we made a couple of mistakes that they capitalized on. We've just got to hit the reset button.

"We've been in this situation now three times in the playoffs, and we've always come back with a big rebound game."

The Kings might have to get some rebounds past 40-year-old Devils goalie Martin Brodeur, who has been in top form all series, and stopped 21 shots in Game 4. The NHL's career winningest goalie doesn't appear to be satisfied with the three Stanley Cup titles he already has.

"Marty played well for them and made some big saves," Brown said. "Tonight was a battle out there, and now it's just a matter of having the same approach in the next game."

The Kings were trying to become the first team to sweep the Devils in a best-of-seven series, and the first to sweep the finals since the 1998 Detroit Red Wings.

New Jersey had managed a total of only two goals in the first three games ? dropping a pair of 2-1 overtime decisions at home before losing 4-0 in Los Angeles in Game 3.

Los Angeles has won a record 10 straight road games in these playoffs, and 12 consecutive postseason games away from home, dating to last year. If the Kings win one more in New Jersey, they will also own the mark for most road wins in a playoff year with 11.

"Whether you win or lose, we don't have time to get down or too excited. We just have to focus on the next one," goalie Jonathan Quick said. "We've played well on the road, but at the same time, we try to play the same way whether you're on the road or at home. We're just focused on the next one, and that's all it is. This one is in the past."

Quick faced 72 shots in the first three games, and the only two that got past him were a bounce off the chest of Kings defenseman Slava Voynov, and Ryan Carter's deflection of Marek Zidlicky's shot. On Wednesday, he was beaten by Henrique's perfectly placed wrist shot.

"They were desperate in all of the games," Kings forward Anze Kopitar said. "Everybody is bringing their 'A' game in the finals, and we're going to have to do it again. We have to bury the chances we get.

"They seem like they had chances off the rush, and they capitalized on those. They played with a little more desperation than we did, and we have to correct that in Game 5."

Teams that had a chance to win the Cup on home ice are 6-8 since 2000. The last four champions closed the deal on the road. The Kings could be primed to repeat that feat.

"We didn't have our best game, and they did," defenseman Matt Greene said. "They played well. We knew they were going to come out hard, and they did. We have to be tighter in the defensive zone and tighter in our game if we want to win.

"I think we played OK, but that's not going to cut it right now. We've got to do a better job of moving the puck faster out of our zone, getting more sustained pressure in theirs and disrupting their game."

The Kings can take comfort in the fact that teams who led 3-0 in the Stanley Cup finals have won the series 24 of 25 times since the NHL went to a best-of-seven format in 1939. The only exception is the 1942 Detroit Red Wings, who blew the big lead against the Toronto Maple Leafs.

None of the Kings appeared worried Wednesday that the Stanley Cup was slipping out of their grasp. The games have been tight, and Los Angeles has effectively shut down the Devils' power play, which is 0 for 15 in the series.

"I don't think we were expecting to win in four before the finals started," Kings forward Simon Gagne said. "We're in a great position, but it's going to be a big fight. We all know that fourth one is going to be the toughest one to win.

"Sure, you're disappointed. You hope you could do it in front of your fans. But at the same time, it's the Stanley Cup finals, and it's going to take a lot of work to get it done. They played well, and we came up short. That's the bottom line. Now we have to focus on the next game. That's it."

Associated Press

intc ipad mini nfl schedule 2012 andrew shaw christina aguilera tupac hologram

Sunday, June 3, 2012

Are You Ready to Launch a Home Based Writing Business? | Gist Blog

Before launching your home based business, you may be wondering if you have what it takes. Writing is an excellent home based business opportunity, but you must first ensure that you?re comfortable with both your ability and the availability of work. Here are some important issues to consider if you think you may be ready to use your idea for a home based business.

Your Writing Ability It doesn?t matter if you are the next Shakespeare, being able to write well on a deadline is essential for a top home based business. If you?re the kind of writer that requires hours of research or must proofread your articles eight times, you will probably not be able to create enough content to meet your goals. You must be fast and confident in order to succeed.

The Availability of Work No writer who owns their own home based business should rely on one or two clients. Writing is a highly fluid market, and your customers could be gone tomorrow. To combat this volatility, you should have a wide selection of clients who buy content. You may decide to start your own blogs or try your hand at e-books. No matter what your decision, never feel dependent exclusively on only one income source.

Deciding to start your own home based business is often a matter of having the right skill set and a large amount of work available to you. If both of those criteria are met, you will flourish in your chosen field.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized by admin. Bookmark the permalink.

eric holder eric holder carole king crystal renn matilda cab calloway melissa gilbert

Saturday, May 26, 2012

NBA 2012 Playoffs ECSF G6-1(24 may) MIA Heat@IND Pacers 720p5 1


Download Direct: NBA 2012 Playoffs ECSF G6-1(24 may) MIA Heat@IND Pacers 720p5 1 - No Client needed
Download torrent: NBA 2012 Playoffs ECSF G6-1(24 may) MIA Heat@IND Pacers 720p5 1 torrent download
Torrent created: 25 May 2012 09:03:19
Torrent added: 26 May 2012 02:35:05
Torrent's info hash: 5F6AB0453E9572D5685731856D53D477A540178F
Category: Movies / Other
Seeds: - Scraping... Last scraped 40 min ago
Leeches: -
Downloads: -
Announce(s):
Tracker S L DL
http://tracker.thepiratebay.org/announce---
udp://tracker.openbittorrent.com:80---
udp://tracker.ccc.de:80---
udp://tracker.publicbt.com:80---
http://retracker.local/announce---
Total Size: 17.26?GB
Files:

NBA.2012.Playoffs.ECSF.Pacers.@.Heat.HDTV.720p.x264/NBA [05.20.2012] Miami Heat @ Indiana Pacers.mp4 - 3.11?GB
NBA.2012.Playoffs.ECSF.Pacers.@.Heat.HDTV.720p.x264/NBA [05.13.2012] Indiana Pacers @ Miami Heat.mp4 - 3.01?GB
NBA.2012.Playoffs.ECSF.Pacers.@.Heat.HDTV.720p.x264/NBA [05.15.2012] Indiana Pacers @ Miami Heat.mp4 - 2.86?GB
NBA.2012.Playoffs.ECSF.Pacers.@.Heat.HDTV.720p.x264/NBA [05.24.2012] Miami Heat @ Indiana Pacers.mp4 - 2.82?GB
NBA.2012.Playoffs.ECSF.Pacers.@.Heat.HDTV.720p.x264/NBA [05.22.2012] Indiana Pacers @ Miami Heat.mp4 - 2.8?GB
NBA.2012.Playoffs.ECSF.Pacers.@.Heat.HDTV.720p.x264/NBA [05.17.2012] Miami Heat @ Indiana Pacers.mp4 - 2.65?GB


NBA 2012 Playoffs ECSF G6-1(24 may) MIA Heat@IND Pacers 720p5 1 Torrent Description


apostasy canon powershot elph 300 hs christmas lights canon eos rebel t3 christmas photo cards ar 15 costco

Monday, May 21, 2012

APNewsBreak: 22 states join campaign finance fight

HELENA, Mont. (AP) ? Twenty-two states and the District of Columbia are backing Montana in its fight to prevent the U.S. Supreme Court's 2010 Citizens United decision from being used to strike down state laws restricting corporate campaign spending.

The states led by New York are asking the high court to preserve Montana's state-level regulations on corporate political expenditures, according to a copy of a brief written by New York's attorney general's office and obtained by The Associated Press. The brief will be publicly released Monday.

The Supreme Court is being asked to reverse a state court's decision to uphold the Montana law. Virginia-based American Tradition Partnership is asking the nation's high court to rule without a hearing because the group says the state law conflicts directly with the Citizens United decision that removed the federal ban on corporate campaign spending.

The Supreme Court has blocked the Montana law until it can look at the case.

The Montana case has prompted critics to hope the court will reverse itself on the controversial Citizens United ruling. The 22 states and D.C. say the Montana law is sharply different from the federal issues in the Citizens United case, so the ruling shouldn't apply to Montana's or other state laws regulating corporate campaign spending.

But the states also said they would support a Supreme Court decision to reconsider portions of the Citizens United ruling either in a future case or in the Montana case, if the justices decide to take it on.

Legal observers say don't count on the Supreme Court reconsidering its decision.

"It is highly unlikely that the Court would reverse its decision in Citizens United," said law professor Richard L. Hasen of the University of California-Irvine.

At best, the court would listen to arguments and might agree a clarification is needed to allow the Montana law to stand. But even that is a long shot, Hasen said.

Montana Attorney General Steve Bullock argues that political corruption in the Copper King era led to the state ban on corporate campaign spending. A clarification of Citizens United is needed to make clear that states can block certain political spending in the interest of limiting corruption, he said.

American Tradition Partnership argues that the state bans unfairly restrict the ability of corporations to engage in the political process that also affects them.

Bullock wrote in a brief to be released Monday that the state does not "ban" corporate political speech, rather, it regulates that speech by requiring the formation of political action committees.

The Democrat, who is running for governor, said the upstart political corporations hoping to take advantage of unfettered spending are merely "an anonymous conduit of unaccountable campaign spending."

Montana and the other states are asking the court to either let the Montana Supreme Court decision stand or to hold a full hearing. They argue laws like the one in Montana that bans political spending straight from corporate treasuries are needed to prevent corruption.

The other states, many with their own type of restrictions hanging in the balance, argue local restrictions are far different than the federal ban the court decided unconstitutionally restricted free speech. Further, state elections are at much greater risk than federal elections of being dominated by corporate money, requiring tailored regulation, the states' court filing says.

"The federal law struck down in Citizens United applied only to elections for President and U.S. Congress," New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman wrote on behalf of the states. "By contrast, Montana's law applies to a wide range of state and local offices, including judgeships and law enforcement positions such as sheriff and county prosecutor."

The joining states, unlike Montana, ask the court to go further and reconsider core findings in Citizens United. They argue, for instance, it was wrong for the court to say unlimited independent expenditures rarely cause corruption or the appearance of corruption.

And other critics of the Citizens United decision who believe the court was wrong to grant corporations constitutional rights, have intervened and asked the court to reverse itself.

"There is a growing bipartisan consensus that Citizens United needs to be overturned, and Montana is leading the way," said Peter Schurman, spokesman for a group called Free Speech For People. "The Supreme Court has an opportunity to revisit Citizens United here. That is important because there is evidence everywhere that unlimited spending in our elections creates both corruption and the appearance for corruption."

On Friday, Montana's case was given a boost when U.S. Sens. John McCain, R-Ariz., and Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., signed on in support. The senators argue evidence following the Citizens United decision, where millions in unregulated money has poured into presidential elections, shows that large independent expenditures can lead to corruption.

The states who filed the brief in support of Montana are New York, Arkansas, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nevada, New Mexico, North Carolina, Rhode Island, Utah, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia and the District of Columbia.

___

Associated Press writer Mark Sherman in Washington contributed to this report.

lollapalooza fbi most wanted list stuttering james van der beek dyngus day indonesia quake stephen strasburg

Sunday, December 25, 2011